Utah Public Schools Inform Students, Teachers About New Guidelines for Transgender Restroom Usage Sparking Confusion

Utah Public Schools students Teachers New Guidelines Transgender Restroom Usage Sparks Confusion transgender

By Jackelyn Cornejo , Parent Herald May 03, 10:02 am

Photo: (Photo : JACK GUEZ/AFP via Getty Images )

Utah's public schools are hastily gearing up as the state implements stricter measures starting Wednesday to ensure compliance with new restroom regulations for transgender individuals.

Utah's New Guidelines for Transgender Restroom Usage

These regulations, mandating the use of bathrooms and changing rooms based on assigned birth sex in government-owned buildings, have been largely unenforced since their signing into law by Republican Gov. Spencer Cox on Jan. 30.

However, with the introduction of significant penalties for non-compliance, schools, and government entities are now under pressure.

The implementation process has been marred by confusion among Utah families due to varying plans across districts, a situation mirrored in other Republican-led states with similar restrictions.

Utah State Rep. Kera Birkeland, the primary sponsor of the bill, argues it's necessary to safeguard against potential misuse of gendered spaces, although evidence of such incidents is lacking according to transgender residents.

Communication about the changes is at the discretion of each school district, with methods ranging from classroom presentations to private meetings with affected families.

Despite differing approaches, major school districts share a common goal of ensuring the safety of affected individuals while managing issues internally.

Principals in several school districts have been trained to address bathroom concerns with discretion and empathy for LGBTQ+ students. However, some individuals like 11-year-old Graham Beeton find the mandated accommodations isolating.

Transgender individuals in Utah can only use facilities aligning with their gender identity if they've legally changed their birth certificate gender and undergone certain surgeries, which are rare among minors.

The rollout has prompted early exits and support gatherings among parents, who express concerns about the practical enforcement of the law on children and its impact on their lives.

Some students, like fourth graders Lila and Sophia, are confused about the rationale behind the law and worry about its effects on their peers' self-esteem.

Transgender teacher Bree Taylor-Lof, emotionally affected by having to explain the policy to students, received support from their students, highlighting the youth's sense of justice and inclusion.

Using Bathrooms According to the Sex Assigned at Birth

Utah, led by Republican Governor Spencer Cox, enacted a law requiring individuals to use bathrooms and locker rooms in public schools and government-owned buildings based on their assigned birth sex.

The legislation allows transgender individuals to defend themselves by demonstrating gender-affirming surgery and changes on their birth certificates, though not all states permit such alterations.

It mandates schools to create "privacy plans" for transgender students, but critics fear this could inadvertently expose their identities. Similar laws are in place in at least 10 other states, with nine regulating transgender students' bathroom usage in schools.

The law also requires new government buildings to have single-occupant bathrooms but lacks funding for upgrades in existing buildings.

Sponsored by Republican Rep. Kera Birkeland, the law aims to address safety concerns, but opponents argue it targets transgender individuals rather than behavior.

The ACLU criticized the law for perpetuating discrimination and warned of potential discriminatory enforcement. Violators could face trespassing charges if their presence causes alarm, with penalties including loitering, lewdness, or voyeurism.

The bill was amended to exempt public school students from criminal charges for using bathrooms aligning with their gender identity, but Equality Utah still opposed it. There were no objections to the provision allowing the state to enforce certain federal Title IX provisions.